Home Policy Pages Membership Daily Quote Events Notebook
 

 

THE TTALK daily quote
on Global Trade and Investment

Published by
 The Global Business Dialogue, Inc.
Washington, D.C.       Tel: 202-463-5074
Email:
comments@ttalk.biz

 

Powered by GBD Patrons, Sponsors, and Premium Members

TTALK QUOTE FOR WEDDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2009
Filed from Washington, DC

Click here for yesterday's Kevin Brady quote on the Pending FTAs.

 

BUY AMERICAN REDUX

"The ‘Buy American’ provisions … will significantly delay the implementation of job-creating projects …. The result will be delayed projects, few projects funded, and fewer Americans put back to work."

28 Business Associations*
December 16, 2009

Context:  The U.S. House of Representatives is likely to vote on a new jobs bill this week, perhaps today. Described as having a price tag of $150 billion for new construction projects and for assistance “to cash-strapped states,” the bill now also contains the same “Buy American” provision that Congress included year’s stimulus bill. In the language of the legislation: “All funds provided under this Act shall be subject to the requirements of Section 1605 division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-5).”

Responding to this new Buy American initiative, 28 U.S. business associations sent a letter earlier today to the leaders in the House and the Senate: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Minority Leader John Boehner, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Today’s quote is a compressed version of one paragraph of that letter. The full paragraph reads as follows:

At a time of significant unemployment, particularly in sectors meant to benefit from infrastructure and stimulus spending – such as construction, construction equipment and manufacturing – any jobs legislation should seek to get money spent quickly and in the most efficient and effective manner without delay. The “Buy American” provisions are antithetical to that objective. In fact, new more restrictive “Buy American” provisions, such as those included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), will significantly delay the implementation of job-creating projects and diminish competition and efficiency in the contracting process, with a resultant lowering in the quality and cost effectiveness of infrastructure improvements. The result will be delayed projects, fewer projects funded, and fewer Americans put back to work.

The letter puts a good deal of emphasis on funding for water systems, and it explains that the local authorities responsible for many of those projects were effectively stopped in their tracks by the Buy American provisions of the stimulus bill.

Comments: In matching up recent and pending Buy American legislation with commercial realities, the analogy that comes to mind is a surgeon operating with a sledge hammer. The commerce at issues – like almost all commerce today – involves both domestic and foreign suppliers, and both are harmed when requirements that cannot be met block the normal flow of work. Presumably that is why American groups like the Water and Wastewater Equipment Manufacturers Association and the National Association of Pipe Fabricators are among the signatories to today’s letter.
The letter also notes another big class of losers in the scenario that is unfolding: U.S. exporters. Citing a recent study by the Chamber of Commerce, today’s association letter suggests that “If foreign governments lock U.S. companies out of just one percent of their own stimulus spending, the net U.S. job loss could surpass 170,000.”

All such estimates can be challenged. For our part, we believe the argument this one illustrates is fundamentally sound, but it is complex. (For example, not all buy national policies abroad are responses to U.S. initiatives. Some are purely home grown.) What this week’s debate does make clear, however, is that the language of the stimulus bill was not a limited, one time initiative with a short shelf-life. Rather it is a continuing feature of this Congress’s view of American trade and trade policy and of the direction in which they wish to take it.


*The Signatories to Today’s Business Letter on Jobs and Buy American

Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed)
Aerospace Industries Association (AIA)
American Business Conference
American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC)
Associated Builders and Contractors
Association of Equipment Manufacturers (AEM)
The Associated General Contractors of America
Business Roundtable (BR)
California Chamber of Commerce
Clean Water Construction Coalition
Coalition of Service Industries (CSI)
Computer and Communications Industry Association
Computing Technology Industry Association
Consuming Industries Trade Action Coalition
Emergency Committee for American Trade (ECAT)
European-American Business Council
Information Technology Industry Council (ITI)
National Association of Foreign Trade Zones (NAFTZ)
National Association of Manufacturers (NAM)
National Association of Pipe Fabricators (NAPF)
National Foreign Trade Council (NFTC)
Organization for International Investment (OFII)
Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA)
Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA)
TechAmerica
United States Council for International Business (USCIB)
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and
Water and Wastewater Equipment Manufacturers Association (WWEMA)

SOURCES AND LINKS:

Buy American Redux is a link to the page on the ECAT (Emergency Committee for American Trade) website with text of the letter discussed above.

House to Vote on Jobs Bill takes you to a Reuters report on this legislation as published on the New York Times website. 

TO RESPOND

Send an email to Comments@ttalk.biz

TO GET THE TTALK DAILY QUOTES IN YOUR INBOX,
CLICK
 Quote Request

On Opinions in GBD Publications

The Global Business Dialogue is an organization in which the members and the staff speak for themselves.  It does not express collective views or take group positions.  The views expressed in the TTALK Quotes, in The Global Positions Notebook, and in other GBD publications are those of the editors, authors, and others as attributed.  Editor: R. K. Morris

©2009 The Global Business Dialogue, Inc.
Wednesday, December 16,  2009